Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

"If perchance I have misquoted you, or spelt your name wrong, or missed something like that, email me/ICQ me and I will cordially tell you i don't give a shit"
-Fractal_Wave




#1 [29760]
136.2.1.101
First in war, first in peace, first in the comments section.
#2 dr_scribble[29765]
proxy16.ykt.prodigy.net
i don't know bout the rest of u. but i thought taht this really i mean really sucked.
#3 Syndrome Zed[29771]
wmb6217-daley.neuro.emory.edu
Sucked? No, definitely didn't suck. If you want sucked, read Roqu's report.

This one was pretty good. From what I read, it was a FFA on Temple. The only thing that sucked about it was the fact that one of the players fell to lings early in the game, making the FFA really just a 1v1. Other than the game potentially being bad, this was pretty good.

To the author: My only problem with it was that you occasionally slipped out of "zerg" mode and began describing things as a more traditional BR. And sometimes talked about the Toss constructing things instead of warping them. Oh, and as far as I know lings don't have any loyalty b/c they're completely under control of the cerebrate/overlords. But that's just getting picky...:)

Good BR. Hope part 2 comes soon.





#4 Dausuul[29944]
hillmac2.cc.purdue.edu
Cool. About time we heard more Zerg-POV reports. Why should Terrans get all the glory? This is really nicely done, too.

I will shortly be contributing another BR of my own to further expand Zerg literature... forward the Swarm.

#5 Oddjob0047[30002]
ts5-8.amery.spacestar.net
This was really good, I liked it, but the map was Char Magma, (obviously) not temple.
#6 [z]cp187[30032]
sac3-201.calweb.com
I thought it was great. BRs are kewl to read, but they're so much more interesting in story form. great job!
#7 Nafarias[30055]
83-184.dialup.itsnet.com
Thanks for the feedback folks. Encourage me and I'll finish it. It takes time to write these thing - ick. Hopefully for the next installment I can figure out a way to make the story a little less like a narration and more like an 'experience'. I can't quite wrap my head around the Zerg perspective too well since it is a hive mentality and not likely to be too individualistic (which is the perspective that makes the best 'story'). Suggestions/feedback welcome at nafisk@itsnet.com

#8 nameguy[30057]
dynamic0.pm02.pleasanton.best.com
I like the pov here and the way u kept the terrans a secret. whens the 2nd part coming?
#9 Dausuul[30119]
heav227mac26.cc.purdue.edu
One thing to keep in mind is that the Zerg aren't a true hive mind. Cerebrates have their own personalities and thoughts; the Overmind (or Kerrigan, if you prefer) rules them but does not dictate their thoughts. (Otherwise, what would be the point of having Cerebrates?)

I did a report like this a month or two ago, told in the first person from a Cerebrate's point of view. It seemed to go over pretty well. If you want my take on the subject, do a search for my name--or wait a few days; I'll probably be putting up another one on Sunday or Monday.

#10 <font color=yellow> |]agomar[91968]
static-24.itcanada.com
The writing was nice, the idea very good, the content somewhat lacking and the a little tiring. This was at times a little wordy, and some things were slightly muddled. Nevertheless I feel the 7 is well deserved, and perhaps it should be bumped up to a 7.5 or 8.

Good job Nef! ;)

#11 jugnuts[92382]
cy662178-a.huntgtn1.wv.home.com
Dag, you so posted that a few days ago (as if this is supposed to convey some sort of useful time-reference..yes, i'm still on drugs)



Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report