| #1 [68581] |
| b3g27vey16c4.bc.hsia.telus.net |
| first |
| #2 Tariq[68582] |
| 198.168.49.221 |
| ok game but the report was weak |
| #3 aToM[68583] |
| h24-70-120-49.cg.shawcable.net |
| ok whatever man |
| #4 Jin[68584] |
| dialup-209.245.197.104.Houston1.Level3.net |
Pretty good report!
Ownage, my best yet, 4 |
| #5 aToM[68585] |
| h24-70-120-49.cg.shawcable.net |
| Can i see your reports Tariq? |
| #6 Breeze[68587] |
| pool36-var.techno-link.com |
Cool report, aToM.
Go Monty!!!! :) |
#7  [68593] |
| 63.164.154.2 |
| Nice little report. Normally a 5 or a 6 because of its small size, but it was nicely layed out and included a world class player, so I give it a 7. |
| #8 MultipleBoogies a.k.a }|battle'lord|{[68611] |
| access1-1.onatel.bf |
If this was your first, then good job. If not, you need to do a little more work.
One commendation, excellent screen shots. The captured the essense of the action & then loaded damn quick :O).
What needs work is some drama, excitement; you know...make us click our mouses on the darn scroll buttons like maddened "mad cows." Pepper, that's what it needs!
Keep it real & peace,
MultipleBoogies a.k.a }|battle'lord|{
|
| #9 WarGod[68621] |
| cm985140-b.denton1.tx.home.com |
nice pics, could use a background tho. a little short you need to put more detail to where a 5 minute game is still fairly long.nice report all in all i couldnt do much better considering ive never done one.
oh i almost forgot, do you know how to take screenshots with an imac?
War
p.s. id give it a 7 or something near that |
| #10 Starookie[68626] |
| edtn010012.hs.telusplanet.net |
| More detail, bigger pics. However, nicely layed out and formated. Better collages than i could ever make (youll see in my 2nd br =[ ). I'd give this a <font size=6>7.2 |
| #11 (DL)Spam[68628] |
| hst000003162um.kincannon.olemiss.edu |
Incredibly one sided
|
| #12 Tariq[68629] |
| yul23.dialin.netaxis.ca |
guess I should write this repot "OWNED HARD" but then again it wouldn't be much of a comment section. Don't take a simple statment so personally.
Look on the left side of the screen and you'll see the magic "search engine". Guess what it does.... |
| #13 Sexy^Orangutang[68635] |
| spider-we021.proxy.aol.com |
don't waste ure time reporting such one sided games. After the bunker, sindred didnt have a chance. I hope the second game is better gamewise, but more detail would be better. But if this is ure first br, u did good given the crappy one sided game.
6.9 |
| #14 Snork~Dimmy[68638] |
| async223-per2-isp-5.nas.one.net.au |
ok, not bad, the game was crap, no offense to the players, but that game blew ass.
One tip: when doing collages like the one of the marines running his base over, if re-sizing pics, do it right, they were not clear and looked crap, when re-sizing do it evenly.
Most of u ppl know what i mean, someone could prolly explain it better.
Final tip to <b>all</b>, Lost temple has been used to death, move on guys. |
| #15 Mezcalito[68643] |
| cvx-mal-1-35.ppp.netlink.se |
| I'm wondering what you meant by saying that Sindread has been playing for 4 years. Do you mean online gaming or just starcraft/bw? Since Starcraft came out in Spring '98 I find it hard for anyone to have been playing this game for more than two and a half years, obviously... |
| #16 :+:SlipKnoT:+:[68649] |
| bc-kam-a53-01-96.look.ca |
| Whoa neato |
| #17 _Insanitarium_[68655] |
| 165.161.3.14 |
| This report was one sided....and Terran won!! |
| #18 BUU[68658] |
| 207.80.13.5 |
| woah... sc only came out in spring '98? damn.... seems like longer to me... |
| #19 Shepherd[68661] |
| res104a-013.rh.rit.edu |
Hmmm. . .I know that the ppl are high ranked, and I expected a lot more than just this from those type of players. Crappy game. Too one-sided. Not very enjoyable for me to read. I love those games where you don't know who will win. . .but after the hatch. . .I was waiting for victory from zerg, but didn't happen. . .guess that was too be expected. Oh well.
5 |
| #20 aToM[68662] |
| h24-70-120-49.cg.shawcable.net |
| SC came out along time ago longer then spring 98, i got it in spring 98, and it had been out for awhile |
| #21 aToM[68663] |
| h24-70-120-49.cg.shawcable.net |
| But in a sense you may be right, ill ask him next game. |
| #22 aToM[68664] |
| h24-70-120-49.cg.shawcable.net |
| The next game is way better!!! |
| #23 Breeze[68688] |
| pool23-var.techno-link.com |
| By the way I liked the game, I was always curious to see Montaro's favourite early Barracks strat in action. And he used it against a very good player. Thanks for reporting that, now we all see how powerful this build order is! |
| #24 Dausuul[68693] |
| lucre.tcom.purdue.edu |
*sigh* Terrans owning Zerg on Lost Temple with marines and medics. Ho hum. Not as bad as Protoss owning Terrans on Lost Temple with dragoons, zealots, and templar, but not particularly interesting either.
The reporting was good--not inspired, but good--but the game was pretty dull. Better luck next time.
P.S. to WarGod: Command-Shift-3 takes screenshots in MacOS.
--Dausuul |
| #25 Dog101[68699] |
| 63.48.129.161 |
Pretty good, w/ world-class players but the game was all one-sided the moment the bunker finished. 7.
Dog |
| #26 <font color=yellow> |]agomar[69097] |
| static-36.itcanada.com |
Kinda boring br, could have been better . . . but hey, it's your first and for that it was nicely done. Not-so-good game, but oh well.
6.5 |
Home
Forum
Starcraft Tournaments
