| #1 -citizenkane-[69885] |
| c209662-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com |
My first BR, BTW
Wow. I've got two first comments in one day! |
| #2 -citizenkane-[69887] |
| c209662-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com |
| Umm, crap, what happened to my pictures? D= |
| #3 Scarab[69905] |
| AC80D9E9.ipt.aol.com |
| way to basically copy the html off of that other guys chess report, damn |
| #4 TeCh[69911] |
| 24.65.124.22.sk.wave.home.com |
| Yeah I've seen that before... |
| #5 -citizenkane-[69941] |
| c209662-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com |
| If you know a better HTML scheme I'd like to hear it. |
| #6 how u jump from step 16 to 17???[69943] |
| dyn-wien-209-94.dyn.columbia.edu |
| Name |
| #7 (DL)Spam[69954] |
| hst000003162um.kincannon.olemiss.edu |
Lacks the quality of writing, originality, and basiclly the intrest that Rumpels provided.
As I see just a "me too!" report =/
Next time report a game YOU played, itd make it significantly more intresting. |
#8 [69984] |
| 208.196.35.239 |
I believe this particular matchup has been reported before... It looks very familiar.
Anyway, I like chess and sure it was a blatant copy, but it was an interesting game.
6
Dref |
| #9 mlylecarlin[69990] |
| adsl-64-216-18-165.dsl.snantx.swbell.net |
6? Bah. 7.5 or an 8.
mlylecarlin |
| #10 -citizenkane-[70000] |
| c209662-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com |
Bah!
Yes, that piticular matchup is probably the most reported matchup in chess history.
Lessons learned:
1) Do an original game.
2) Work on a different HTML scheme.
3) Include the little rows and colums on the chess boards.
My next report, tenetavily titled "The Rudest Chess Game Ever" will star a famous but still lesser-known game. It will star a completely new format, better writing (I hope) and the little rows and colums of algebraic notation. It also will feature the correct pics in the correct place ^^
If this one got 6, then the next one will get gold. I think. |
| #11 [bad]derek[70020] |
| spider-wq034.proxy.aol.com |
| wtf is with the last picture? isnt that impossible!? |
| #12 -citizenkane-[70031] |
| c209662-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com |
| Derek, read comments above |
| #13 [AsF]AzNSuNBoY[70039] |
| ACA16A7D.ipt.aol.com |
Ummm...wow.
Unfortunately, this game wasn't half as interesting as many others you could have selected... (try Anderssen-Kieseritzky!) Very one sided with too many gay pins to give black a chance. |
| #14 Rumpelstiltskin[70529] |
| 213.131.139.130 |
<ahem>
J/k, this puts a smile to my face. It seems I have inspired the entire BR community to start thinking, playing, and writing about chess. Hell, even a chess tourney is on (thanks Nobo!) and noone could be happier than me :)
Minor quibbles with this one... Pity the last diagram is wrong, it confuses people. I heard about it before I saw it, that people who wanted to understand just didn't get it at all - that's bad :/ Hope an admin can fix it... Second, this game is reported already on this site -- I didn't know that when I wrote mine, I actually thought mine was the first <sniff> but there we are...
Plus side: a lot of effort has been put into this. Some favourite quotes: "Base layout is important in chess." Excellent simily. And the "Scooby Doo specials"-remark was absolutely vile (which incidentally is my handle on the Internet Chess Club, AbsolutelyVile... look me up...) and comparing the piece values to minerals was a nice touch.
I'm working on a new chess BR too... It's a bit different from the last one, in that it will feature alternative variations, easier-to-follow and... wait, I'm not giving away everything :)
So, all in all, this was a treat. Of course I can afford to say that, seeing as it didn't outscore mine ;)
Hope to see ya soun, kane... over-the-board...
/Rump
P.S.
Wait a minute... didn't you write in Nobo's board that I was "not a god"? Bah! Changing my mind. Now I'd rate this a -1! ;) |
| #15 Dirk[79251] |
| 62.4.176.68 |
This is the greatest chessgame of all times. But one should note that, pure technically speaking,
8. Bxf7+! would have been better than 8. Nc3. I agree though: a) bringing out more pieces is
more Morphy-alike; b) if Morphy had played it, I wouldn't sit here talking about "the greatest chessgame
ever". Nice comments on a game that will live forever! |
| #16 Tom[128064] |
| c-65-97-16-172.va.client2.attbi.com |
| This was great. I enjoyed reading it. You should teach chess. |
| #17 jimmy[136263] |
| 144.139.223.201 |
What # 17 said, and I've seen tighter chess games.
Of course, that's beside the point :P
-NJ |