| #1 Pleasance[122258] |
| adsl-66-123-55-239.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net |
| Nothin says lovin like an instant 1 |
| #2 whiteboy[122259] |
| 208-58-201-2.s510.tnt1.abrd.md.dialup.rcn.com |
| you'll have a definite gold once you find a decent game to BR. |
| #3 whiteboy[122261] |
| 208-58-201-2.s510.tnt1.abrd.md.dialup.rcn.com |
also, what is with that rating? i've seen horrible fanfics get at least 5's, and finally someone writes an actual report (albeit on a craptastic game) and gets a 1.
lame. |
| #4 Kane[122262] |
| 12-233-180-134.client.attbi.com |
| I assume the rater attempted to give this an 7, but give it 7/7 instead. |
| #5 Sexy^Orangutang[122263] |
| 12-234-99-99.client.attbi.com |
| re-enter your rating daggy :/ |
| #6 beaverfeaver[122264] |
| h24-66-143-220.gv.shawcable.net |
| How did this report get 1? This was atleast a 6 maybe a 7 but only cause the game was short. |
| #7 mattzarella[122265] |
| spider-tr034.proxy.aol.com |
| i liked the timeline idea a lot :) |
| #8 -the o_0-[122266] |
| 24.138.58.44 |
I'll admit this isn't that good, but it's deserving of something higher than a 1. Like a 3. :D
You didn't do too poorly, get a game that wasn't involving offensive towers as half of it and I'll be happy. |
| #9 User14[122267] |
| spider-ntc-td044.proxy.aol.com |
| u got the artistic skills to make a nice report, just get a good game now and add some more zest and flavor with your text and some lettuce and tomatoe with your flair... |
| #10 pocketGosu[122268] |
| dialup-209.246.106.52.Dial1.NewYork1.Level3.net |
| The game content is poor, but the overall layout and the timeline idea was pretty good. A 1 is ridiculous. I'd give it a 6-7 only because of the poor game content. |
#11  [122270] |
| Ottawa-ppp3517200.sympatico.ca |
| I didn't rate this yet :/ |
| #12 [122271] |
| Ottawa-ppp3517200.sympatico.ca |
Unless I'm missing something here, this was a good first br. You show good promise as a reporter. Keep writing battle reports - hopefully on longer games next time ;).
Foremost thing I could mention is better humour and an avoidance of such things as "PEONS > HERO BAHAHAHAHAHA" which was highly gay. 5 for horrible game. |
| #13 Blarg[122272] |
| h00045a0a16d0.ne.client2.attbi.com |
WTF!! Why did this get a 4.0?? After all the shit we've been looking at, all the crappy fanfic and half-conceived text only BRs and poorly written and encoded HTML brs (of which my first was one, sorry :[) I definitely think this deserves.... well it's not spectacular but it's not below average either...
*sigh* not like my opinion matters. |
| #14 apos'trophe[122273] |
| adsl-63-200-51-170.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net |
| Bah. It's getting so actual br-less that I'm reading brs about a game that I have never played, probably never will, and frankly don't care much for. Wow I'm pathetic. |
| #15 Lieutenant[122274] |
| adsl-66-72-132-138.dsl.dytnoh.ameritech.net |
| I had a witty comment ready halfway through the br, but I forgot it now. Oh well, we're all probly better off for it. =/ |
| #16 Lieutenant[122275] |
| adsl-66-72-132-138.dsl.dytnoh.ameritech.net |
| Still don't remember what it was, but I'd just like to say wc3's graphics in no-motion images are highly confusing... ?_? If not for the Hero's glow I might not be able to tell the difference between a Blademaster and a Grunt. |
| #17 Blarg[122276] |
| h00045a0a16d0.ne.client2.attbi.com |
aaargh, it wasn't EVEN 4.0 :)
Sorry, I'll stop disagreeing now :) |
| #18 LuckyNewbie:P[122278] |
| dialup-65.58.58.53.Dial1.Denver1.Level3.net |
| ack, everyones using the score table at bottom now TT |
| #19 LuckyNewbie:P[122279] |
| dialup-65.58.58.53.Dial1.Denver1.Level3.net |
| not that its a bad th ing |
| #20 corpus[122283] |
| AC886C28.ipt.aol.com |
| your still here? Nicely done, bad game 5 sounds right on, like the timeline but noones going to just look at timeline and not read report...so dont say stupid stuff : P |
| #21 LuckyNewbie:P[122284] |
| dialup-65.58.58.53.Dial1.Denver1.Level3.net |
| TIME the prophet... the warning has been given, our fate is now our own |
| #22 Nightwisp[122291] |
| 12-221-134-121.client.insightBB.com |
| Well I liked it. It was hilarious war3 constant action all the way. And no crappy text-only n00b (me) could turn this 4 minute game into a funny report. Avenge me peons! 7.688 |
| #23 Decay[122293] |
| 206.10.109.46 |
OMG, I... I... I AGREE WITH TIME! <------- *gets shot by 7684903 different people at the same time* I'm just gonna assume that the one was Dref's rating, but wtf? A one?! That damn br where the guy tried to make a map by doing this: l---lMl--__g._-=M:"--=,.,.-=, etc got a 2. And this deserved a one with the actual html that he used?! Even Dag rated this one lower than it should be. Albeit it was a crappy game, but it was well written and the first br with pictures that we've seen since Luckys! Aside from epochs fanfics of course....
Anyways, don't quit writing brs, just find a better game next time and you ought to get gold. ;]
~Decay |
| #24 Sargaras[122294] |
| ACAEAF6D.ipt.aol.com |
could the RATER justifies his rating of 1 ???
what the hell? at least it was readable, spacing and pics.
Even if it's a short game, it doesn't deserve a 1
That 's very insulting for newcomers br reporters. |
| #25 Nafarias[122297] |
| 216.169.198.9 |
| I wouldn't worry too much abou the ratings on this website time. Most of the people who are supposed to be 'raters' on this site never come here anymore, and the powers that be here never consider 'hiring' better raters who would be here on a more regular basis. The website was much better about 1.5 years ago when there were lots of raters who read everything and all the reports were on actual BATTLES and not fanfic slush. Take the ratings with a grain of salt, because most of the 'ratings' nowendays are utterly, completely, and wholly meaningless. Compared with everything else we have had lately - your report is a solid 7. |
| #26 Pleasance[122301] |
| adsl-66-123-55-239.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net |
You know, I don't think a rater gave it a 1, it was just some sort of bug. Getting a 1 immediately after posting the report with no explanation is just a little, odd.
Next one will be better. |
| #27 Nafarias[122304] |
| 216.169.198.9 |
| Personally, I don't think the report 'sucked'. This website has not yet had a lot of reports on WC3 games, and the Orc tower rush is a strategy people need to be informed about. Your report illustrated its perils and pitfalls to the public. I think it was educational. Certainly the writing was not bad. The game was short, but it was a cheese rush so what can you say? Once it fails the llama leaves. Game over. However, we can all benefit from the bad example that player set and learn to be aware of the tower rush before Blizzard nerfs it somehow. |
| #28 Flint79[122310] |
| 24.114.84.69 |
| Back in the day...this would be like an 8. Damn the evolution of battle reporting! Damn the man who invented helium! I thought it was decent...and for a first BR...well hell you got promise. |
| #29 Redemption6[122314] |
| cache-1.sbo.ma.webcache.rcn.net |
| I thought this was decent coverage for a 4 minute game and that this couldve been gold..... |
| #30 DarkRider[122317] |
| 198.134.2.2 |
6
Better game and you would have gotten higher.
Good job on turning a 4 min game into a br.
|
| #31 [122326] |
| St-Catherines-ppp112413.sympatico.ca |
| I think the rating might be caused by the fact that I rated a couple spam reports with 1s at nearly the exact time Mark deleted them, perhaps causing the next br to be granted an immediate 1. Not sure though. |
| #32 Pleasance[122329] |
| adsl-66-125-152-11.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net |
| Dagomar: Is there a way to get the 1 revoked? Should I try contacting an admin about this? |
| #33 Lieutenant[122332] |
| adsl-66-72-132-138.dsl.dytnoh.ameritech.net |
| If no one really gave it an honest 1, then it really doesn't matter. You just got kicked in the pants by lady luck. =/ |
| #34 Redemption6[122357] |
| cache-1.sbo.ma.webcache.rcn.net |
| ROFL IT WAS CHJS RATING! YEA THATZ RIGHT DID YOU ALL FORGET ABOUT HIM HUH?! haha im jk i dunno who the fuck rated a 1 but thatz just unreasonable. WHERE THE HELL IS CHJ by the way, i mean was he part of a dream or something cuz it seems that he got rating status and then ran off ....... |
| #35 zeon[122362] |
| CPE014100005949.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com |
| ok, well whatever with the one. im sure something will happen with it or mark4 will leave it cuz the report sucks anyways. :) jk. |
| #36 killa_ling[abc][122368] |
| adsl-63-203-73-188.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net |
i thought u did nice stuff with the html coding. i also liked the time line. get better content and a battle that lasts longer than 5:56 and hey...
it might be good, i mean uh, better :-) |
| #37 demon_blade3[122394] |
| dsc05.ivn-ca-1-241.rasserver.net |
| its not a matter of what rating this BR got, its a mattaer of what you all think of it. just like that jackass british guy on the poor ass show American Idle..... |
| #38 demon_blade3[122395] |
| dsc05.ivn-ca-1-241.rasserver.net |
| idol* dammit i can never spell right when something involved with warcraft 3 comes along |
| #39 UndeadPaperclip[122429] |
| 125.21.8.67.cfl.rr.com |
| I'd give it a 5, higher if it wasn't a four minute game with only one real battle, but nice job in making a four minute game into a eight minute read, do a longer report next time and you're almost garunteed at least a 7.5 |
| #40 Vigilant[122590] |
| pcp122800pcs.clmntn01.nj.comcast.net |
| I'd give it a light sprinkling of black pepper, a dash of salt, a modest amount of garlic and hot peppers, and just a little olive oil. I'd also throw in some potatoes to round out a hearty, delicious meal. Oh, and the onions! Not too thinly sliced, mind. They have to be flavorful, and juicy. Not just any onion will do when you're preparing a Battle Report. |
| #41 jason[122756] |
| scf1-fe0-1.wc.optusnet.com.au |
you suck balls
|
| #42 someone[122757] |
| scf1-fe0-1.wc.optusnet.com.au |
honestly that was shit
|
| #43 I_am_Nitros[122909] |
| h64-141-18-78.sunwave.net |
| undead liches own. I don't care what you say... |
Home
Forum
Starcraft Tournaments
