#1  [166505] |
| dblt-216-227-28-193.gtcom.net |
| Approved! |
| #2 des[166506] |
| cpe-066-057-043-097.nc.res.rr.com |
| double approved! |
| #3 mattzarella[166509] |
| c-68-42-51-228.hsd1.fl.comcast.net |
| disapprove |
| #4 wakiki[166512] |
| unknown.al.charter.com |
| Two more good reports. Don't know what else to say. :P |
| #5 TerranMenace[166513] |
| 76.251.71.8 |
| Nice job Psy, your only problem in the first game was removing the probe block too soon other than that no real flaws. I like how you went about cheesing in a relatively safe manner yet its easier to get 2 cannons instead of 1 incase your cheese fails so things like that dont happen. |
| #6 Psyonic_Reaver[166514] |
| bbb72-0-175-177.bendbroadband.com |
| I really didn't expect him to go all in Zergling. My fault for not scouting better and//or expecting it. |
| #7 TerranMenace[166515] |
| 76.251.69.39 |
Well when you delay zergs expo for that long hes put so far behind that his only option is some kind of a quick all in build in an attempt to atleast get back in the game. That or a drone rush. :P
As for the second game I like your arbiter usage. It should work alot better with 5-6 cosairs that have +1 to kill ovies/scourge and zerg never really expects it. If you want to be even more annoying, add a few (1-3) dark archons for maelstorm and laugh as psi storm, maelstorm, and stasis decimate zerg armies. Reavers can work great with arbs as well. |
#8  [166517] |
| user-142o1kl.cable.mindspring.com |
way to prevail in the rematch!
This report was missing terran players though. =( |
| #9 TerranMenace[166518] |
| adsl-76-212-199-193.dsl.sndg02.sbcglobal.net |
| Don't worry JV, he still has to update it. |
| #10 Raider[166520] |
| c-76-21-163-24.hsd1.va.comcast.net |
A quick read. I enjoyed reading about the arbiter use vs zerg.
The whole thing though was very brief and had a air of being done as an afterthought. There was no description of the battles at all, just a mention of the fact that they happened. It was also somewhat hard to follow what was happening where on the map. Maybe it was your writing, but the games also seemed below average.
Overall, a very average reports.
6. |
#11  [166522] |
| CPE000fb007f011-CM001371143574.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com |
| Agreed with Raider. This is a six to me, barely. This report was exceptionally short, devoid of passion or any descriptions of the battles. Meh. |
| #12 [166523] |
| dblt-216-227-28-193.gtcom.net |
GJ on failing to read, dag. ;p
"Enjoy what you can out of this and, again, I'll update a few more games to this report so please don't rate it until I say it's ok." |
| #13 Raider[166524] |
| c-76-21-163-24.hsd1.va.comcast.net |
Apparently, I missed that part as well. Really not a fan of work-in-progress reports. Just write the whole thing and be done with it. I'm going to add stuff later so keep checking out this one BR seems annoying. If I had read that, probably would have voted for a 5.
Also, promise of more games to come does not make description of the ones already there any better... |
| #14 [166527] |
| CPE000fb007f011-CM001371143574.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com |
I agree very, very strongly with Raider on this point, and that's rare as hell. As a reader I don't want to keep checking back on a report and seeing little updates. That's okay when you're actually progressing through a game, bit by bit, but in this case I don't agree with it.
Still, I give props to any author of any new br. |
| #15 wakiki[166535] |
| unknown.al.charter.com |
I agree, I think one report per game or one report for several games posted all at once is better than updates.
However, I would gladly take updates over no new reports at all!
Any idea when you can post the rest of it (or a new report) psy?
=) |
| #16 Feanor[166567] |
| urz-p513.rz.uni-jena.de |
Nice one...
...except for a picture maniac like me... (sob) |
| #17 Feanor[166571] |
| urz-p521.rz.uni-jena.de |
| thus only a 7 (stupid me, forgot giveing a rating:[) |
Home
Forum
Starcraft Tournaments
